Dear President Bush:
The Presidential Prayer Team is currently urging us to: "Pray for the President as he seeks wisdom on how to legally codify the definition of marriage. Pray that it will be according to Biblical principles. With any forces insisting on variant definitions of marriage, pray that God's Word and His standards will be honored by our government."
Any religious person believes prayer should be balanced by action. So here, in support of the Prayer Team's admirable goals, is a proposed Constitutional Amendment to codify marriage on biblical principles:
A. Marriage in the United States shall consist of a union between one man and one or more women. (Gen29:17-28; II Sam 3:2-5)
B. Marriage shall not impede a man's right to take concubines, in addition to his wife or wives. (II Sam5:13; I Kings 11:3; II Chron 11:21)
C. A marriage shall be considered valid only if the wife is a virgin. If the wife is not a virgin, she shall be executed. (Deut 22:13-21)
D. Marriage of a believer and a non-believer shall be forbidden. (Gen24:3; Num 25:1-9; Ezra 9:12; Neh10:30)
E. Since marriage is for life, neither this Constitution nor the constitution of any State, nor any state or federal law, shall be construed to permit divorce. (Deut 22:19; Mark 10:9)
F. If a married man dies without children, his brother shall marry the widow. If he refuses to marry his brother's widow or deliberately does not give her children, he shall pay a fine of one shoe. (Gen.38:6-10; Deut 25:5-10)
Wednesday, January 17, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Why do Militant Atheists Believe any Anti-Christian Claim they Hear? This List is not a list of Bilal quotes. (Though I Have seen many listed as such, Esp. the Marriage shall not be Valid one) and often is just flat Wrong. For example, Abraham telling His Servant He wants His Son to Marry Someone of His Own People and not of Canaan does not equal "Non-believers can't marry Believers", and the Infamous Marriage shall only be Valid if the Wife is a Virgin reference is not what Deuteronomy says at all.
Non of the references say what this Claims they say.
Post a Comment